22 Comments

Solution for asylum seekers? Reintroduce slavery

English: A slave auction was held near this lo...

English: A slave auction was held near this location in Zanzibar for many years. This is an image of a sculpture, Memory for the Slaves by Clara Sörnäs, concrete, 1998. See here for more details. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I really don’t get the problem with all this asylum seeker nonsense. The solution is simple and we don’t even have to go and capture or buy them from West Africa like the Americans did back in the day. They come to us for free! In fact, some even pay smugglers to get here, so why turn them away?

Look, it worked for England and America and a few other countries: they built great economies on the backs of the slaves. Politicians are always saying we need to improve our productivity: what better way than not having to pay for labour!

Instead of paying billions to send these obviously fit and able-bodied non-whites to PNG, why not put them to work? Everyone wins! The asylum seekers get a safe haven and Australia gets a productivity increase!

Some basic slave protections will be needed, to at least look as if we are being humanitarian. The following are a few suggestions:

  • Slave owners must provide a minimum of two meals a day
  • Slaves must be provided with at least four changes of clothes and a set of “Sunday best” for church – we are a Christian country after all
  • Children under 10 must not work more than four hours a day
  • Medical care will be provided by the Commonwealth at a reduced cost to slave owners
  • English language tuition to be provided each day after the sun has gone down
  • Housing must meet legislated minimums
  • Slaves will be entitled to one labour free day a week and two weeks rest per year
  • Occupational Health & Safety regulations and legislation must be complied with as for paid labour
  • There will be no corporal punishment (we have advanced slightly since the 1600s)

Continue Reading »

9 Comments

United Nations smacks Australia’s asylum seeker policies

Congratulations to Professor Ben Saul for an amazing victory.

The United Nations Human Rights Committee has found Australia to be in violation of no fewer than 150 points of international law in relation to the indefinite detention of 40 asylum seekers.

Professor Saul is quoted as saying:

It is a major embarrassment for Australia, which is a member of the Security Council and often criticises human rights in other countries. Australia should do the right thing by respecting its international obligations and treating the refugees decently.”

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/federal-election-2013/australia-violated-refugees-human-rights-un-says-20130822-2sdxq.html (Edit Feb 2015: This article has now been archived by The Age and is no longer freely available.)

Please read the full article on The Age website.  This may be just the precedent needed to force a more humane approach to people fleeing persecution and arriving in Australia.

38 Comments

Sex Appeal in Politics

Tony Abbott copped a lot of flak in the media, mainstream and social, for introducing the candidate for Lindsay, Fiona Scott, by saying “I think I can probably say have a bit of sex appeal”.

Tracey Spicer wrote a great article for The Hoopla:

Too often, a woman’s stocks rise and fall on the value of her sexuality. I’m sure I’m not the only one who’s wanted to scream, “Stop looking at my tits and listen to what I have to say!”

Then in middle age, we are disappeared by the diminution of this appeal.

http://thehoopla.com.au/hey-tony-1950s-called/

Clementine Ford wrote for The Sydney Morning Herald:

Some people have leapt on the comments as evidence of Abbott’s inherent misogyny, but that’s being a little opportunistic. Abbott isn’t a misogynist (he owns four women, remember?) any more than he is a worthy candidate to run the country.

http://www.smh.com.au/comment/abbotts-gift-of-the-gaffe-no-joke-for-women-20130814-2rwqy.html#ixzz2cVHZLUYk

Ed Butler wrote a piece for AusVotes2013

Time and again, Tony Abbott has, in his unguarded moments, gaffed. As we all do. But time and again, his gaffes somehow always come back to a certain view of women’s role in society.

http://ausvotes2013.com/2013/08/15/its-not-a-gaffe-its-a-trend/

All these articles took a slightly different approach to the problem of Tony’s gaffe, but from a somewhat dispassionate distance.

Continue Reading »

11 Comments

A Palindromic Moment

Yesterday I lightheartedly suggested I should do something to celebrate reaching 222,222 page views as the number just seemed, to the accountant in me, to be interesting (even though we accountants like to round things to the nearest thousand).

A Twitter acquaintance took me on a mathematical learning journey I thought others might also enjoy!

Repeating numbers like 222,222 are all divisible by 37. Both the dividend and the quotient are palindromic. I had no idea what palindromic meant, so I had to resort to our old friend Google, where I discovered the meaning!

A palindromic number is a number (in some base b) that is the same when written forwards or backwards, i.e., of the form a_1a_2...a_2a_1.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/PalindromicNumber.html

What have I forgotten from school all those years ago? Seems like maybe quite a bit, as I am SURE we would have learnt this!

This web site is about to have a palindromic moment! I like it! 😀

16 Comments

There are days I despise the human race

Shark

Courtesy of “I Love Fucking Science” – Facebook

Criminal Minds Season 7 Promo

Criminal Minds Season 7 Promo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

There are days I despise the human race: today is one of them.

Regular readers know I am a “Criminal Minds” fan. I rarely get to watch it on the actual TV, I tend to catch-up by watching episodes on the computer.

Last night I watched episode 19 of series 8 about a guy kidnapping and killing nannies. It was a bit on the gruesome side, even for this crime show fan. I’ve thought a few of this series 8 a little gruesome.

Continue Reading »

21 Comments

Want to make a political comment? How risky is it really?

The last time I checked, Australia was a democracy. In fact, SO democratic are we that it is compulsory to vote if one is eligible. Is not voting an expression of political opinion?

I have long been aware there is no implicit or explicit right to free speech in Australia’s constitution however there has always, by custom and practice, been a right to express our political opinions in what we believe is this great free nation of ours. If you turn off that right, where do you draw the line?

Back in 2010 a public servant by the name of Greg Jericho was happily blogging under the name of Grog’s Gamut, expressing political opinions. His political opinions. While Greg subsequently left the employ of the APS, as far as I know he was not compelled to leave once his cover was blown.

More recently another public servant has been taken to task for expressing personal views anonymously. Michaela Banerji, an employee of the Department of Immigration and Citizenship (DIAC), has just lost a case in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia relating to her private expressions of concern.

Judge Neville found Australians had no ”unfettered implied right (or freedom) of political expression”.

Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/national/public-servant-loses-fight-over-twitter-attack-on-government-20130812-2rsgn.html#ixzz2c1PrbQZi

I have the judgement to hand and have read it. You may do so too here, if you are legally minded.

Continue Reading »

21 Comments

Re-blogging: not sure how I feel about it

Blogging Heroes

Blogging Heroes (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This is a personal perspective! I found this week I re-blogged two articles one after the other. On the one hand I hate re-blogging because I feel as if I am stealing someone else’s work, even though all I am technically doing is sharing an excerpt with a link.

On the other hand sometimes I really, really want to share something I have read and re-blogging is a good tool to do that. Hopefully readers browsing my site will click over to the other writer and read the full article. Re-blogging is more time efficient that Tweeting several times, for example. Is it really any different to sharing to StumbleUpon, apart from StumbleUpon’s vastly superior “hit juice”?

I recall a heated discussion about re-blogging on the WordPress forums some time ago – there were for and against arguments, as there should be. I can’t remember now where I stood at the time, or if I sat on the fence!

How do I feel if an article of my own is re-blogged, I thought to myself. That should be a reasonable indication of how others feel if I re-blog one of their articles.

It depends. If I find an article of mine re-blogged to a site that is nothing but re-blogs, I’m not overly impressed. I don’t really like such sites, but I am aware that is my personal opinion. Perhaps “re-blog only” sites have a regular readership who like to follow those sites to give them easy access to a range of articles.

If I am re-blogged to sites like TheAntiBogan or Lyn’s Daily Links (The Political Sword) I am very happy because it usually generates a lot of visitors!

Therein lies my guilt, I think. I know I can’t generate as many visitors for the people I re-blog as those sites, so I end up feeling as if I am stealing rather than supporting their work. I also wonder if it makes me look too lazy to write my own stuff! 😆

I try not to re-blog because of this, but when something calls to my heart, as Lisa’s article did yesterday, and is related to topics I also write about, I feel it is justified.

I read an article this morning I really liked, World View Through a Straw which ties in with an article of my own from early last year, Entitlement Mentality: A  Personal Perspective. I have resisted the urge to re-blog, I’ve done too many this week! It is a good article though, so sneak over and read!

Do other bloggers feel this same conundrum? Is it just me? Am I being overly paranoid?

What of readers? Do readers dislike re-blogged material on sites they follow?

I’d really love to hear your thoughts on this, readers and writers alike!

12 Comments

Is our children’s generation addicted to electronics?

Slot machine.

Slot machine. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I went to the hairdresser this morning (YAY for me!) and we were talking about the looming election and I mentioned we need to invest adequately in education for our future.

“What we need to invest in”, she declared, “is get the computers out of schools and get them off phones!”

My hairdresser’s admittedly anecdotal evidence was she sees it every day. Young kids who can’t be separated from their digital lives. She has a friend whose 20 year-old son will, in her view, never get a job because he has no social skills whatsoever. She sees young kids come in with their parents to the salon and they have their heads glued to their phone games. She saw her own nephew glued to his computer to the exclusion of all else when recently on holidays.

I remember taking my kids to the dentist or the doctor and they are bored without their phones to play on. How did we ever survive when we were kids?

I agreed with my hairdresser than many of the younger generation write as they text: “C u l8er”. Hardly the makings of the next BHP CEO.

Continue Reading »

17 Comments

The Sapphires new cover: racist, sexist or opportunistic?

I’ve seen The Sapphires and I loved the movie. The acting was great, the story a terrific (and true) story.

Today I read it is being released in the US with this cover:

The Sapphires USA release artwork

The Sapphires USA release artwork

W. T. F?

Continue Reading »

14 Comments

Would our politicians get on a boat?

English: Kevin Rudd, 26th Prime Minister of Au...

English: Kevin Rudd, 26th Prime Minister of Australia. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

I believe it is time our politicians, especially Abbott, Morrison, Rudd, Bowen and a few others, took an honest look at themselves. Whether you personally like these particular men or not, they have reached the most senior positions in Australian politics. Let me share a little secret – they didn’t get there by being gifted those positions. They fought, sometimes figuratively sticking a knife in a political opponent’s back. These guys have balls. They don’t sit around waiting in some imaginary political queue.

If these men were honest with the electorate, if they were honest with themselves, they know damn well they’d get on a boat. If they wouldn’t, I’m not that sure they really have to balls to run the country – do you? Continue Reading »